The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) on Tuesday announced that 1,995 out of 5,315 passed the Certified Public Accountant (CPA) Licensure Examination given by the Board of Accountancy in the cities of Manila, Baguio, Cagayan De Oro, Cebu, Davao, Iloilo and Legazpi this May 2012.
Here is the list of Top 10 passers of May 2012 Certified Public Accountant (CPA) Licensure Examination or May 2012 CPA Board Exam held in different testing centers nationwide. The successful examinees who garnered the ten (10) highest places in the May 2012 Certified Public Accountant Licensure Examination are the following:
RANK NAME SCHOOL RATING(%)
1. MANUEL PILLORA BUENSUCESO JR (SAN BEDA COLLEGE) – 94.86
(2) KATHRINE ROSE CO CATINDIG (UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS) – 94.43
(3) GRACE MENOR ALBUNIAN (TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES-MANILA) – 93.00
(4) GIANNA TAN CHUA (UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS) – 92.57
(4) MONIQUE KRIS FLORANTE VILLAFLOR (TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES-MANILA) – 92.57
(5) RICHARD LEI PACIENCIA CAÑETE (EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY) (FOR.LIT)TACLOBAN – 92.43
(5) BONVIN GO NUQUI (DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY-MANILA) – 92.43
(6) BENSON PABIONA KOTAH (CHIANG KAI SHEK COLLEGE) – 92.14
(6)ROWELL CANDA MARASIGAN (RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY) – 92.14
(7) KENNETH JEFFERSON UN UY (UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS) – 92.00
(8) JESSICA JEAN GALOSO GANDEZA (UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN) – 91.86
(9) SHERALD WINCHEL PINTACASI ANG (UNIVERSITY OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION-DAVAO) – 91.71
(9) EDMOND EMPERIO (UNIVERSITY OF SAN JOSE RECOLETOS) – 91.71
(10) SHEARILYNN LIM GO (UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS) – 91.57
(10) RAYMUND ACESOR TINAMISAN (MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIV. FOUNDATION-LUCENA CITY) – 91.57
The performance of schools in the May 2012 Certified Public Accountant (CPA) Licensure Examination in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) “To monitor the performance of schools in licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of national circulation” is as follows: (Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.)
